📑 CASE REPORT: THE FAKE ID MYSTERY

Presenter & Investigator: Pranav Sharma

Accused: Saksham Kumar Roshan

Alleged Victim: Mahi Arya

🔍 1️⃣ INTRODUCTION

This case investigates the suspected digital impersonation of Mahi Arya by Saksham Kumar Roshan, through the creation and misuse of fake Instagram accounts. The primary objective is to determine whether the August 2025 account — @mahi086893 — is authentic or fabricated, and to expose contradictions in Saksham’s defense.

The evidence suggests a pattern of deception aimed at inflating social status among peers by fabricating romantic/intimate interactions under a false female identity.

📅 2️⃣ TIMELINE & KEY EVIDENCE

⏳ Account Creation Timeline:

• November 2024: First suspicious ID created → @mahiarya8134 (~200 followers)
• August 2025: Second ID created → @mahi086893 (~72 followers, public, claimed “real” by Saksham)

❗ Suspicious that the “real” account has fewer followers and was created after the first.

🖼️ Supporting Evidence (Screenshots Attached):

• Profile creation dates, display pictures (DPs), and bios.
• Follower analysis: Majority inactive/fake followers on an account supposedly belonging to a “private girl.”
• Chat logs: When challenged from the “fake” ID, the “real” ID refused to type even a simple “Hi.”

📱 3️⃣ TECHNICAL PROOF — PHONE NUMBER LINKAGE

• Instagram’s Account Recovery feature confirms:
  ➤ @mahi086893 is linked to phone number ending in **99

• Cross-verified with Saksham’s personal devices:
  ➤ His registered WhatsApp number: 9693979599

✅ Conclusion: Direct technical proof that Saksham controls the “Mahi” account.

❓ 4️⃣ CROSS EXAMINATION — CONTRADICTIONS & RED FLAGS

🎭 A. Identity Contradictions

• How can a “real” account be created after a fake one?
• Why does Saksham follow the account he himself calls “fake”?
• Why did @mahi086893 suddenly follow Pranav Sharma without context?
• Why do both IDs + Saksham’s own chats show identical spelling mistakes and slang?
• Why refuse to type “Hi” when challenged? → Avoiding linguistic/typing exposure.

🚩 B. Behavioral Red Flags

• Random unsolicited statement: “Saksham asked me for kiss and hug” — no girl would volunteer this unprompted.
• Claim: “I gave him 2 kisses in anger” — sounds like male boasting, not female confession.
• Use of boyish slang: “Lodu Lalit” (insulting teachers) — matches Saksham’s tone exactly.
• Bio changes: “RCB Fan” → “Be honest & loyal” — mirrors Saksham’s own WhatsApp bio shifts (“Psycho person”).

💡 C. Motive Indicators

• Clear intent to impress classmates by pretending to talk to/be intimate with a girl.
• Fabricated kiss/hug stories = classic social flex.
• Why share “private” moments publicly? → Only makes sense if seeking validation from audience (Pranav/others).

🧩 5️⃣ CLOSING STATEMENT

Every piece of evidence — timeline, language, behavior, tech logs — forms an undeniable pattern:

🔹 Both Instagram IDs (@mahiarya8134, @mahi086893) are operated by Saksham Kumar Roshan.
🔹 Motive: Psychological compensation + social status inflation via fake romance.
🔹 Method: Impersonation, conversation fabrication, rumor-spreading.

This is not teenage mischief — it’s calculated digital deception.

⚖️ VERDICT

GUILTY — DELIBERATE IMPERSONATION & ONLINE DECEPTION

Saksham Kumar Roshan:

• Created fake identities of Mahi Arya.
• Fabricated intimate conversations.
• Used them to manipulate peer perception.
• Left digital fingerprints (phone number, language, behavior) that conclusively tie him to the crime.

🔎 TECHNICAL ANNEXURE — PHONE NUMBER PROOF

📄 Prepared By: Pranav Sharma
📅 Date: April 5, 2025
🔐 All evidence preserved digitally. For official/internal use only.